25 September 2018
Moscow: 04:45
London: 02:45

Consular queries:  
+44 (0) 203 668 7474  
info@rusemb.org.uk  

 

PRESS RELEASES AND NEWS

13.04.2018

Ambassador Yakovenko’s talking points at the press conference

The Skripal case

-  Nearly six weeks have passed since the poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal in Salisbury and exactly a month since Prime Minister Theresa May accused Russia of this crime.

-   The   British   government   still   hasn't   presented   any evidence in support of its position.

-   The   investigation   is   conducted   in   the   most   non-transparent way. The British government refuses to cooperate with the Russian authorities, which have not received a single request for assistance.

-  The Foreign and Commonwealth Office is continuously ignoring our legitimate requests and questions concerning the condition of Mr and Ms Skripal and the circumstances of this incident.

-    Without   any   explanation,   the   British   Government continues to violate its obligations under the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations and the bilateral Consular Convention. We are not allowed to see our citizens, talk to doctors, have no idea about the treatment the Russian nationals receive.

-  The British authorities consistently deny consular access to Yulia Skripal and her father. We cannot be sure that Yulia's refusal to see us is genuine.

-  The British government continues to conceal information regarding whereabouts of Yulia Skripal, who was discharged from   hospital   and   allegedly  transferred  to   either   a   "safe location",  or a "military base", or a "well-guarded country house".

- We have every reason to see such actions as an abduction of the two Russian nationals or at least as their forcible isolation. The statement made by Scotland Yard on behalf of Yulia only confirms our suspicions.

-  We get the impression that the British Government is deliberately  pursuing  the  policy  of destroying  all  possible evidence, classifying all remaining materials and making an independent and transparent investigation impossible.

- The cooperation between the UK and the OPCW is non-transparent as well. Instead of using the normal OPCW procedures whereby the UK could have engaged Russia directly or through the OPCW Executive Council, the UK has chosen to cooperate bilaterally with the OPCW Technical Secretariat under an arrangement the details of which are unknown.

 

Murder of Mr Glushkov

- The Embassy is unsatisfied with the current level of interaction with the authorities.

-  On 6 April FCO invited us to contact the Metropolitan Police directly.

-  Last Monday I sent a letter to the Metropolitan Police Commissioner Ms Cressida Dick with a request for a meeting in order to discuss this case in details. No answer has been received yet.

 

Russia’s position on the OPCW report

-          Russia has received the OPCW report on the Salisbury incident. We will be able to comment on it after our experts study it carefully. At this stage, I have to say, that in order to draw conclusions, we have to look at the chemical and spectral analysis of the samples.

-          Today Russia is going to send an official request to the United Kingdom under Article IX, paragraph 2 of the Chemical Weapons Convention.

- Under that Article, States Parties should make every effort to clarify and resolve any matter which may cause doubt about compliance with the Convention through exchange of information and consultations. A State Party which receives a request shall provide a reply within 10 days.

-          It is regrettable that the UK invited OPCW experts under Article VIII of the Chemical Weapons Convention, which does not provide for direct cooperation between the parties concerned.

-          We have noted yesterday’s statement by Foreign Secretary Johnson, who said that “the OPCW has confirmed the findings of the United Kingdom, and that was a military grade nerve agent – Novichok, and only Russia has the means, motive and record”. This is not the case. Porton Down and now the OPCW have refrained from identifying the source of the substance. This is another reason why the United Kingdom should cooperate with Russia. Such cooperation would raise chances to obtain answers to the question of where this substance came from and who is the perpetrator of this crime.

 

Syria

- The situation in Syria and the military action the US is threatening to undertake along with its UK and French allies are at the focus of our attention today.

- A few words about the reason or rather the pretext for those threats – the alleged use of chemical weapons in Douma, part of Eastern Ghouta enclave near Damascus.

- The Syrian Government has been repeatedly warning for at least a month that rebels prepare to stage a provocation with chemical weapons in this very area.

- Such reports indeed appeared on 7 April, from the notorious “White Helmets”, who receive support from the UK Government and have been proved more than once to be staging attacks and spreading fake reports. Other groups include the Syrian American Medical Society and the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, operating from the US and the UK respectively.

- Syrian authorities were immediately blamed by the US and its allies for this so-called “attack”. Again, no tangible proof was presented and no questions asked.

- Why would Damascus use chemical weapons in a situation where peaceful evacuation of militants was underway and the area was being liberated?

- Russian services for chemical and radiological security visited the suspected site of the incident in Douma and did not find any traces of chemical substances there. No persons treated for chemical poisoning were found in local hospitals.

- We are interested in seeing independent experts there, so they can make all the necessary tests. We welcome the OPCW Director-General’s decision to send a fact-finding team to Douma at the request of the Syrian Government. We believe it should be deployed as soon as possible and we are ready to assist in ensuring its safety. Hope they will arrive tomorrow. Any delay may be used to carry out military strikes to cover up all the evidence, or lack thereof, on the ground.

- We would like them to engage in a thorough examination in line with the rules – that means visiting the place of the alleged incident and taking samples, not just remotely studying social media messages and pictures.

- Two draft UN SC resolutions proposed by Russia with the aim to create a neutral investigative mechanism were blocked by the same three permanent Security Council members who are now threatening to act as a prosecutor, a judge and an executor, “punishing” Syria for an alleged “crime” that no one has investigated. It is clear that the goal of these unsubstantiated lies and the new blatant campaign against Syria is to discredit the Syrian government and to justify the possible use of force by external actors.

- Any military action against Syrian Government is against international law, against the Charter of the United Nations.

- The infamous aggression against Iraq in 2003 immediately comes to mind, when the then-Prime Minister Tony Blair deliberately misinformed the Parliament and the public. It is well known how it ended – with Chilcot inquiry delivering a condemnatory verdict.

- We are witnessing very dangerous developments. The current US policies supported almost mechanically by the UK and France are becoming a threat to the peace and security in the region and beyond.

- We urge the international community not to remain idle and to voice concern over the inconsiderate actions the US and its allies are planning to take.

 

Eastern Ghouta and Douma

- As a result of the complex humanitarian operation, over 170 000 people have been evacuated from Eastern Ghouta. More than 40 000 people have left Douma, via safe corridors. Russian military police entered the city yesterday.

- Situation in Eastern Ghouta is stabilizing gradually. Government forces have reclaimed control of Eastern Ghouta. The area is thus almost cleared of terrorists and extremists who have been for years killing and injuring civilians, shelling Damascus. Local residents have already started returning to their homes.

- The evacuation has been monitored by UN experts. The residents who left their homes have been placed in temporary centers and provided with food and basic necessities. The Russian military has delivered 518 tons of humanitarian aid to people in need.

- The withdrawal of civilians and the evacuation of militants are carried out absolutely transparently. The Russian Defence Ministry's website continues to offer live broadcasts from video cameras located in Eastern Ghouta.

- Hostilities in Douma have been ceased for 7 days now. The Russian side continues to negotiate the release of hostages taken by terrorists. As a result of agreements with the Jaysh-al-Islam 195 hostages have already been freed.

* * *

- The current situation throughout Syria urgently requires coordinated international efforts to promote peace, including humanitarian assistance.

-          The poor epidemiologic state of Raqqa remains a source of grave concern.

-          Once again we urge the international community to fulfill its duty and provide assistance to the affected Syrian population.




LATEST EVENTS

24.09.2018 - Russia’s position at the 73rd session of the UN General Assembly

1. The objective of the 73rd session of the UN General Assembly (UNGA) is to reaffirm and strengthen the central and coordinating role of the Organization in international affairs. The UN is a unique platform for equitable dialogue aimed at seeking solutions with due regard for different opinions and based on the purposes and principles of its Charter. Any attempts to challenge the UN authority are dangerous and may lead to a dismantled system of international relations. We have consistently advocated a polycentric world order, equal and indivisible security based on unconditional respect for sovereignty and peoples' right to independently choose their development path.


21.09.2018 - Reply by the Embassy’s spokesperson to a media questionregarding the Guardian piece on Julian Assange

Question: How would you comment on today’s Guardian article claiming that “Russian diplomats held secret talks to assess whether they could help Julian Assange flee the UK”? Answer: This publication has nothing to do with the reality. The Embassy has never engaged either with Ecuadorian colleagues, or with anyone else, in discussions on any kind of Russia’s participation in ending Mr Assange’s stay within the diplomatic mission of Ecuador.


21.09.2018 - Russian Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Maria Zakharova on the incident in Salisbury

Why should we trust or distrust Petrov and Boshirov when there’s zero evidence on the table that would in any way link their very existence to the Salisbury incident? Just because these people were there? Then, can Britain provide a list of all the foreigners who were in Salisbury on those days? On top of that, no one has seen Sergey Skripal since the incident. No one has even talked with Julia Skripal. The whole thing is absurd, because these two individuals came in, talked with Simonyan, provided answers to the counts that the UK publicly accused them of, and, for some reason, everyone is now saying, “We do not believe them.” However, when Yulia Skripal spoke before a camera, which was operated by no one knows who, and didn’t answer any question, but instead read a text apparently written for her by someone, and before that published a text similarly written for her by someone, everyone said, “Yes, of course, we trust her.”


20.09.2018 - Embassy Press Officer’s reply to a media question concerning the meeting of the Minister for the Middle East Mr Alistair Burt with the White Helmets group

Question: During his visit to Turkey the Minister for the Middle East Mr Alistair Burt met with the infamous White Helmets group, whom the Russian Federation considers terrorist supporters. How would you comment on that? Answer: It is up to HMG of course to decide which contacts are to develop and whom the senior diplomats are to meet. Nevertheless, this choice is a truly remarkable one.


18.09.2018 - Embassy Press Officer’s reply to a media question concerning the classification of the materials on A.Perepilichny by the UK government

Question: How would you comment on yet another decision of the British side to classify additional information on Mr A.Perepilichny within the inquest into his death? Answer: This procedural decision concerns classification of information on Mr A.Perepilichny’s connections to the British secret services, to wit, whether he has been their agent or made contact with them. It has been made public just before the next hearing of the inquest into the death of Mr A.Perepilichnny, which is scheduled for 21 September in the Old Bailey.


17.09.2018 - Embassy press officer’s reply to a media question concerning the statements of FCO Minister of State Sir Alan Duncan

Question: How would you comment on the statement of Minister of State Sir Alan Duncan to the effect that the UK will “push for new sanctions […] as well as robustly enforcing the existing EU regime against Russia”? Answer: This and other similar statements fall in line with the Conservative government’s current policy aimed at destroying the fabric of Russian-British relations, further isolating Russia and presenting it as a major threat to the “rules-based international system”. Faced with the realities of Brexit, the British government is desperate to convince its partners of the need for a tougher sanctions regime against Russia. As usual, it resorts to insinuations, unverified facts and media leaks. Despite our numerous requests, no evidence of Russia’s responsibility has been provided. Russia’s proposals of cooperation in dealing with common challenges and threats, including in the sphere of cybersecurity and chemical disarmament, are being rejected without explanation.


13.09.2018 - Embassy Press Officer’s reply to a media question concerning upcoming annual conferences of the UK’s major political parties

Question: What does the Embassy expect from the party conference season in the United Kingdom starting this week? Answer: Annual conferences of UK’s major political parties are important events in the country’s life. At the conferences parties set out their priorities on a wide range of issues and arrange open and frank discussions on pressing domestic and international matters. Among other things, they offer a platform for a dialogue between party leaders and activists and the diplomatic corps.


12.09.2018 - Embassy press officer’s reply to a media question concerning the inquiry into the death of Mr Nikolay Glushkov

Question: 12 September marks 6 months since the mysterious murder of the Russian national Nikolay Glushkov in London. Does the Embassy have any new information regarding the circumstances of his death? Answer: Unfortunately, the British side continues to pay no attention to our numerous requests, including the official request of the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation for legal assistance in the criminal case opened in Russia into the death of Mr Nikolay Glushkov, which was delivered to the Home Office as early as in April. The Embassy’s proposals to arrange a meeting between the Russian Ambassador and the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, or between experts from law enforcement authorities of the two countries, made as far back as in April, have also been met with silence.


11.09.2018 - Embassy Press Officer’s reply to a media question concerning the statements by the British officials on retaliatory measures against Russia

Question: How would you comment on the recent statements of the British officials who said that the UK was prepared to “retaliate” against Russia, including by deploying its cyber warfare capabilities? Answer: Yet again, we have seen a series of official statements to the effect that the UK should use its “massive retaliatory capabilities” to counter Russia’s “aggression”. Home Secretary Sajid Javid said on Sunday that the UK had “considerable powers, and we’ll bring all these powers, both covert and overt to bear on Russia”. Last week GCHQ head Jeremy Fleming spoke in a similar vein saying that the British authorities and their allies were prepared to “counter the threat” allegedly posed by Russia. In this context he mentioned a plan to “deploy the full range of tools”, including Britain’s “offensive cyber capability” against Russia. Such statements are reckless, provocative and unfounded.


09.09.2018 - Embassy response to Home Secretary Sajid Javid’s remarks at the Andrew Marr Show, 9 September 2018

Sajid Javid: This [the Salisbury incident] was the act, we now know unequivocally, crystal clear, this was the act of the Russian state. Comment: If Mr Javid has evidence that allows him to make this kind of direct accusations, why wouldn’t he share it with the public? So far, what the public has seen is nothing but photos of two Eastern-European-looking men walking around Salisbury on two different days. Everything else, including exact dates and names, let alone these gentlemen’s involvement in the Skripals poisoning and their links to the Russian state, is only assertions based on unverifiable “intelligence” and on the “lack of alternative explanations”. If the “crystal clear”-level evidence exists, it is in everyone’s interest for it to be published.



all messages