17 February 2019
Moscow: 07:12
London: 04:12

Consular queries:  
+44 (0) 203 668 7474  
info@rusemb.org.uk  

 
350 days have passed since the Salisbury incident - no credible information or response from the British authorities                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     342 days have passed since the death of Nikolay Glushkov on British soil - no credible information or response from the British authorities

PRESS RELEASES AND NEWS

11.02.2019

Statement by Permanent Representative Vassily Nebenzia at UN Security Council meeting on the situation in Kosovo

Thank you, Mr. President,

Above all, we would like to thank our colleagues from Equatorial Guinea for their principal position and for inclusion of a meeting on Kosovo in the Council’s agenda for February in order to discuss the situation in the Province and the report by Secretary-General of 31 January on the implementation of UNSC resolution 1244.

We welcome the participation of Mr. Ivica Dačić, First Deputy Prime-Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs of Serbia. Distinguished Minister, we share the profound concerns about the situation in Kosovo that you talked about.

We are also grateful to Mr. Zahir Tanin, Special Representative of the Secretary-General, Head of the UN Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo for a very informative briefing on the situation in the Province. We give a positive assessment to the work of the Mission. We support you and your efforts. We have also been very interested to listen to the speech by Mm. Vlora Çitaku.

Mm. Çitaku said that she could not understand why we are here today. Now I will explain to you why. Furthermore, Mm. Çitaku read to us the latest pamphlet (in which, by the way, I did not hear any answer to the serious and fair claims that were made about Kosovo by Prime-Minister Dačić). Mm. Çitaku called this meeting of Security Council a “charade”. Thank you very much for your assessment of this meeting. But if you think that this is a charade, then you are very free not to come to these meetings. After all, you are invited to them.

We do not accept the attempts of Pristina’s sponsors to exclude the Kosovo issue from the UNSC agenda. Behind the phrases “recently discussed”, “nothing to discuss”, “situation is calm”, “why so often?” there is the desire to conceal from the international community the truth about the real situation in the Province and behind-the-curtain meddling on Kosovo. This also covers the calls for strategic assessment.

May we remind that according to resolution 1244 the Security Council has always been and still is the main platform for international dialogue on Kosovo. This problem – taking into account its escalation – should remain under tight control of Security Council and be proposed for its consideration in accordance with established practice –in the form of open briefings.

The situation in the Province is very unstable; it can get out of control any time. By the way, analogous assessments have been made during the semi-annual report of the Head of OSCE Mission in Kosovo that has been recently presented at the OSCE Permanent Council meeting.

Kosovo remains the main cradle of instability and source of conflict potential in the Balkans region. Pristina authorities have chosen to exacerbate the crisis, they threaten to get back to violence and war. We take notice of recurring signs showing that Kosovo Albanian leadership 20 years after barbarous NATO bombings of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and after 10 years of unilateral “independence” is coming out of control of the Western countries who had designed this “independence”. We can articulate the question in another way: “Could ‘Pristina leadership’ have behaved in such a manner, had there been no connivance from the outside?” The answer is obvious.

During the period under review, Pristina undertook a series of provocations against Serbia and Serbs who live in the Autonomous Province. The “government” of Kosovo violated the obligations under the Central European Free Trade Agreement and introduced customs tariffs of 100% on goods from Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. This measure is still valid despite the appeals of President of Serbia Aleksandar Vučić in SC. Pristina simply ignores unsubstantiated and unconvincing requests of US and EU to revoke those steps.

Besides on 14 December 2018 the so called “parliament” made a decision to transform Kosovo Security Forces into a full-fledged Kosovo “army” thus gravely violating UNSC resolution 1244. This resolution, as Secretary-General reiterated, remains the core international legal act on Kosovo settlement. It contains a clear demand to demilitarize all armed groups of Kosovar Albanians and allows only multinational contingents under international control to be present in Kosovo. Therefore, should Pristina create armed forces, KFOR will have to disarm them. However, quite on the contrary, the ones who should be preventing this are the ones to encourage the foundation of the “army”.

Western mentors try to whitewash Pristina by saying that this decision would not change the nature of Kosovo Security Forces. But in reality they actually want to double them in number, create reserves and, most importantly – change the very essence of this structure that has been a tool of civil defense up to now. With assistance of the US and a number of NATO countries, Kosovo Albanian military servicemen receive boosted training, increased weapons and technology deliveries. There is no guarantee, that Kosovo “armed forces”, constituted mainly from terrorists of “Kosovo Liberation Army”, will not be deployed against the Serbian population in the North of the Province.

The calls of Kosovo Albanian side to “unite” the North and the South Mitrovica sound particularly alarming. In the current precarious situation any step in this direction may become, as we say, “a spark that would start the fire”.

It is quite evident that all the decisions made in Kosovo are links of the same chain. Their goal – threaten Serb population of the Province and deprive them of opportunity. All this is developing against the background of propagandist bustle about establishing “multiethnic community” in the Province.

In the light of partisan course of our partners, the impotence of mediation efforts of the EU in the dialogue between Belgrade and Pristina is clearly seen and seems to be quite logical. I speak about the efforts to which our partners used to refer as to a guiding star.

Here is a vivid example: for sixth year in a row there has been no progress in implementing the key agreement on establishing a Community of Serb Municipalities in Kosovo. Brussels is unable to make Pristina do this. We hear no reaction to how Kosovar Albanians openly sabotage their obligations. Instead, there are calls upon “both sides” to normalize the relations which only enhance the feeling of total permissiveness by one side and provoke maximalist approaches that do not entail compromise solutions.

Russian position on Kosovo is consistent. We believe that Belgrade and Pristina should find a viable, mutually acceptable and sustainable solution based on UNSC resolution 1244. This solution should be fair, compliant with international law and endorsed by the UN Security Council. To force the so called “ultimate normalization” between Belgrade and Pristina, to link it to some far-fetched time frames would be destructive. If we want stability in the Balkans, we have to be able to look for compromise. When the solutions are found in the course of this work, they should be implemented, not sabotaged. This is true, in particular, for the Community of Serb Municipalities.

Flagrantly irresponsible statements of Pristina about UNMIK raise our deepest concerns. The statement of “prime-minister” of Kosovo Ramush Kharadinay in which he says that his “government” stops cooperation with the Mission – is a blatant violation of resolution 1244. In my paper I had a question here: “I am eager to hear the assessment that our Western partners will give to it. Or will they prefer to ignore him and again pretend nothing has happened?” I listened carefully to the speeches of our colleagues, however I had known the answer in advance: no one even mentioned this.

There is no result of the operation of the Special Court to try crimes committed by militants of “Kosovo Liberation Army”, including kidnapping and murders for the purpose of removing people’s organs. There was a noteworthy interview in Serbian newspaper “Večernje novosti” of Mr. D.Marty, Swiss, former member of Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE), author of the report “Investigation of alleged crimes of inhuman treatment of people and illicit trafficking in human organs in Kosovo”. There are interesting facts in it.

C.Williamson, former US prosecutor of Special Court in the Hague in July 2014 reported that the results of the investigation coincide with the conclusions made by D.Marty, however right after that he resigned. Since then prosecutors have changed three times, but things are not moving.

According to D.Marty, it is “unconceivable, absurd and doubtful” from the point of view of ethics, that the former prosecutor of ICTY G.Nice is now engaged in defending Kosovars in the Special Court. The most notable thought of Marty report is this: it may happen, that Kosovo-Albanian leaders involved in crimes will never be held accountable. We believe it characterizes both the real state of affairs and the potential of the Court and the general trend of its work.

In this regard we emphasize, that unambiguous signals of PACE rapporteur Marty require an adequate reaction of the international community. At stake is the reputation of international justice and of the European Union as a guarantor to the Special Court and to the fulfilment of its duties. Individuals involved in serious crimes, including illicit trafficking of human organs, must receive heavy penalties – no matter what offices in Pristina they hold now. We will not allow to “coil up” this topic, we will continue highlighting it. It may be noted in passing that the position of our Western partners regarding the Special Court proves that they apply multi-levelled standards to international justice.

The Province remains a comfort zone for recruiting radicals, terrorist returnees from Syria and Iraq flow to the region. To our regret, each year less and less refugees and IDPs return to the Province. Crimes against Serbs and their property, whereby culprits escape liability, are a fact of life.

Kosovo Albanians go on appropriating property of the Serbian Orthodox Church. We reiterate that Church of St John the Baptist and the chapel of St Paraskeva Pyatnitsa in the city of Pec are no longer listed in local cadastral documents as SOC property. There have been attempts to start illegitimate construction works in the area near churches and monasteries protected by UNESCO. I remind that UNESCO is an organization Kosovo wanted to become a member of. In the same context we consider the new charter of Mine and Metal Works “Trepča”, situated in the North of the Province and populated by Serbs, that was adopted by Kosovo “parliament”. The new charter envisions unlawful alienation of this Serbian state-owned facility, which thousands of families of this region live from.

We take notice of persistent efforts of Kosovo authorities, supported by a number of countries, to become member of various international organizations. We stick to our unchanging position, that participation of Pristina in multilateral mechanisms is possible only through UNMIK. Otherwise, it would be a grave violation of the provisions of UNSC resolution 1244.

We draw the attention of the UN Secretariat to the need to closely keep track of the situation, which, as indicated by the abovementioned facts, requires strict international scrutiny, and this scrutiny should be performed by the UN Security Council.

I thank you for your attention.

http://russiaun.ru/en/news/kosovo070219




LATEST EVENTS

16.02.2019 - Embassy Press Officer’s reply to a media question concerning the interview by Dawn Sturgess's parents

Question: The Guardian has published an interview with the parents of the British citizen Dawn Sturgess, who died in July last year allegedly from “Novichok” poisoning. They put the blame for the non-transparent investigation on the UK government. How would you comment on their statements? Answer: We have studied carefully the interview and fully agree with Dawn Sturgess's family. Numerous questions regarding the tragedy in Amesbury remain unanswered, the British authorities continue to conceal the circumstances of that incident. We fully understand the fair indignation Dawn Sturgess's relatives feel.


14.02.2019 - Embassy Press Officer’s reply to a media question concerning recent appeals of the British officials to impose new sanctions against Russia

Question: How would you comment on the recent statements by the British officials calling upon their European partners to impose new sanctions against Russia over the incident in the Kerch Strait last year? Answer: We have not been surprised with such an active UK’s approach. Those statements have clearly shown the anti-Russian essence of the current Conservative government’s policy. British officials are doing their utmost to avoid conducting a normal intergovernmental dialogue with Russia, while using only the language of ultimatums and sanctions.


13.02.2019 - Statement by Permanent Representative Vassily Nebenzia at the UN Security Council Briefing on Ukraine

Mr. President, Above all, let me thank today’s briefers: Mr. M.Jenča, Mm. U.Müller, Mr. E.Apakan and Mr. M.Sajdik. We have initiated this meeting in order to discuss the course of implementation of “Package of Measures for the Implementation of the Minsk Agreements” – the most important document for the settlement of Ukraine’s internal crisis. It was signed 4 years ago, on 12 February 2015 by the representatives of OSCE, Ukraine, Russia, DPR and LPR.


09.02.2019 - Embassy Press Officer’s Reply to a media question regarding the UK position on Kosovo at the UN Security Council

Question: How would you comment on the UK position on Kosovo at the UN Security Council (UN SC)? Answer: The developments in the province are still worrying. As we have stressed earlier, Pristina’s decision to transform the Kosovo Security Force into full-fledged “armed forces” is a flagrant violation of the UN SC Resolution 1244 that only allows for the deployment of internationally controlled multinational contingents in the province. What is more, it goes against Kosovo’s own “constitution”.


08.02.2019 - DIPLOMATS’ DAY

On 10 February Russian diplomats mark their professional day – Diplomats’ Day, which was established by a Presidential Decree in 2002 to commemorate the founding of the Russian Diplomatic Service in 1549. The date itself is closely associated with the history of Russia’s first foreign affairs agency – the Ambassadorial Department (or “Posolsky Prikaz” in Russian). On 10 February 1549 the Ambassadorial Department, established by Czar Ivan IV, was first mentioned in official chronicles.


06.02.2019 - Embassy Press Officer’s reply to a media question regarding the latest UK statements on the INF Treaty

Question: How would you comment on the statement made by FCO Minister of State Mark Field in the House of Commons regarding the threat posed by the Russian 9M729 cruise missile? Answer: We have taken note Mr Field’s comment with regard to the INF Treaty calling for Russia to destroy the 9M729 cruise missiles. Such statements by the UK officials are designed to maintain the US-initiated campaign to accuse Russia of violating the INF Treaty, primarily with the aim to justify Washington’s long-planned decision to withdraw from the Treaty. UK Government is perfectly aware that the US has refused to provide any objective data supporting their conclusion that the Russian 9М729 cruise missile has a range prohibited by the INF Treaty. Russia has repeatedly confirmed that its missile programs fully comply with its obligations under the INF Treaty. This also applies to the 9M729 cruise missile, on which Russia provides maximum transparency. During the talks in Geneva on 15 January the Russian side invited US military experts to inspect the missile in order to address any existing concerns. However, this unprecedented step was rejected out of hand, confirming that Washington was simply not interested in maintaining the INF Treaty.


05.02.2019 - Embassy Press Officer’s reply to a media question regarding the UK position on Venezuela

Question: How would you comment on the statement by the Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt recognising National Assembly President, Juan Guaido, as the interim President of Venezuela? Answer: We have repeatedly stated that attempts to change the leadership of Venezuela from outside and by unconstitutional means flagrantly violate the principle of non-interference in internal affairs, which is one of the cornerstones of international law and the UN Charter.


05.02.2019 - Comment by the Information and Press Department on the NATO Council statement on the INF Treaty developments

We have read the NATO Council statement of February 1, 2019 and noted that it was released much earlier than we received a formal notification from the United States about suspending its participation in the 1987 Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles and beginning the exit procedure. Such haste is no surprise for Russia. This is yet another demonstration of the fact that NATO has fully blended with Washington’s line aimed at the final scrapping of the arms control system painstakingly built over many years. The collapse of the INF Treaty will have grave and far-reaching consequences for the entire European security architecture NATO is allegedly deeply concerned about – and naturally, for the US allies in Europe.


04.02.2019 - Foreign Ministry statement

On February 2, the US Department of State issued a press statement officially notifying the Russian Federation that the United States had suspended its obligations under the 1987 Soviet-US Treaty on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles (INF Treaty) and had launched the procedure of withdrawing from it. At the same time, the Americans announced that they no longer consider themselves to be bound by the treaty obligations, which means that they can openly design, produce and deploy the weapon systems prohibited under the treaty.


30.01.2019 - Embassy press officer’s response to a media question concerning the situation with Yulia Skripal

Q.: How would you comment on the intention of Victoria Skripal to make a request to Russian law enforcement agencies to record her cousin Yulia as missing and to initiate a missing person investigation? A.: The Embassy fully understands Victoria Skripal’s desperate call, as we do not have any information regarding the whereabouts and the health conditions of her relatives Sergey and Yulia. Almost a year has passed since the Salisbury incident and we have to state that British authorities and law enforcement agencies still have not provided any official results of the investigation. Numerous requests and proposals for cooperation within the inquiry of our nationals’ poisoning have been left without a response, and the investigation is being carried out in complete secrecy.



all messages