15 May 2021
Moscow: 08:46
London: 06:46

Consular queries:  
+44 (0) 203 668 7474  
info@rusemb.org.uk  

 
1168 days have passed since the Salisbury incident - no credible information or response from the British authorities                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     1160 days have passed since the death of Nikolay Glushkov on British soil - no credible information or response from the British authorities

PRESS RELEASES AND NEWS

17.12.2020

President Vladimir Putin's reply to a BBC question during his annual news conference Moscow, 17 December 2020

Steve Rosenberg, BBC News: Mr President, ‘a new Cold War’ is an expression that one can hear more and more often when it comes to Russia-West relations. And we hear Russia regularly blame external forces for these tensions. It may be America, or Britain, or Nato. But after having been at the helm of power for 20 years, don’t you believe that you are at least partly responsible for the deplorable state of those relations, especially if one recalls Russia’s actions over the recent years, from annexing Crimea to using a chemical weapon on British soil, in Salisbury? Or are you not? Are Russian authorities ‘white and fluffy’? And when it comes to chemical weapons – have you read the Bellingcat report that sets out in detail that the attack on Alexey Navalny was orchestrated by the Russian State? Thank you.
 
President Putin: I have already spoken today on the attack on the famous blogger. I can only add – and we have also repeately made it clear – that we are prepared to conduct an investigation. If anyone has information showing that a chemical weapon was used – in this case, Novichok, as they keep saying – we are asking you: give that information to us please. We have proposed for our experts to be dispatched on the ground, to Germany, to Sweden, to France, so as to tackle this problem together with colleagues. Alternatively, we are asking you to come to us, to bring the biological materials, or at least to provide us with an official report. Steven, can you explain why, despite the numerous requests made by the Office of the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation, we haven’t yet been provided even an official report? German authorities have tranferred the whole file to the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. They [OPCW] do not provide us with anything either, saying that Germany has prohibited them to give out any information. And Germany is saying: you are welcome to get all the information at OPCW. Can you explain that, Steven? Why are we not provided with an official report on Novichok use?
 
Steve Rosenberg: Are you asking me?
 
President Putin: Yes, I am.
 
Steve Rosenberg: Well, I am a journalist, I am asking questions and you are replying.
 
President Putin: OK, please accept my apologies, and I will continue my answer to your question. Let’s consider that question of mine to remain hanging in the air. Regarding whether we are ‘white and fluffy’ and whether we feel any responsibility for what is going on – I feel responsibility for what is happening with Russia and its people, and I will do everything that is in the interests of the Russian Federation. This is also true regarding the return of Crimea into our Russian State. Let me draw your attention to the fact that this was done on the basis of people’s will. In Kosovo, the parliament took a decision [on independence], and you swallowed it and said that that was the right and democratic thing to do. In Crimea, people came to a referendum and voted, yet you don’t like it for some reason. Let me remind you that democracy means power of the people. One needs to either recognize it or to renounce that term, globally. Crimeans are subjected to various sanctions. For what are you introducing sanctions against them? If this was an annexation, then they are not guilty of anything – why are they being punished? And if this was not an annexation but a result of a vote, then this must be recognized as democracy and they must be left in peace, and the claims against Russia over an ‘annexation’ must stop.
 
Now as regards whether we are ‘white and fluffy’. Compared to you – yes, that’s the case, we are white and fluffy. Countries and peoples that wanted to develop independently, we agreed to free them from certain Soviet diktat. We heard and heeded your assurances that Nato would not expand eastwards. But you have not delivered on your promises. Right, those were unwritten assurances, but oral ones including on the part of Nato. But you haven’t done anything. There have been two waves of [Nato] enlargement, and Nato’s military infrastructure is coming closer to our borders. Are we supposed not to react?
 
Was it Russia who abandoned the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty? It was not us, but we are compelled to react by creating new weapon systems that eliminate the threats that we are facing. Then, our colleagues left the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty. Was it us? No, these were our US partners. Then we told them: well, we will not produce or deploy that kind of weapons until US weapons [of that kind] appear in Europe. Nobody is replying or reacting to this.
 
Thereafter, they left the Open Skies Treaty. What are we supposed to do? Shall we leave everything as it is? So that you, being a Nato member, would fly over our us and transfer everything [the imagery] to the Americans, while we would not have that opportunity with regard to US territory.
 
You are smart people, aren’t you? Then why do you think that we are idiots? Why do you think that we cannot analyze this kind of basics?
 
There are other issues that we are concerned with. We have to react to them. Today, the ‘New Start’ Treaty is under threat of being discontinued. If that happens, no limits will remain when it comes to an arms race, nothing at all. We have been, and continue calling upon our [US] partners to extend that Treaty at least by one year, so as to allow us a year to hold substantive negotiations (to use a diplomatic catchphrase) over how to proceed further. We realise that Russia has acquired modern weapon systems, hypersonic ones, that nobody in the world possesses. We fully recognize this, and we are not against taking this into account [in the negotiations]. But so far, nobody is talking to us on that. Similar systems are being developed by European countries, by Britain, by the United States. We are open for negotiations, but nobody is conducting any with us. So this may help you to figure out who is ‘white and fluffy’ and who is ‘thorny and aggressive’.
 
We have two or three [military] bases, and then only in areas prone to terrorist threat, namely in Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Syria. And what about the other side, I mean the United States? A huge network all around the world! Do you know the size of our defence budget? 46 billion [US dollars]. Britain is way ahead. The US has 770 billion. Russia is something like sixth in the world by defence expenditure. The US, China, Saudi Arabia, Britain, France, Japan – they are all ahead of us.
 
So who is ‘white and fluffy’ and who is aggressive? Aggressive, certainly not us. Maybe we are not spotless, but on any account, quite respectable and inclined to have dialogue and find compromise solutions. I’d like to recall the words of Leopold the Cat from one our cartoons: ‘Guys, let’s all get along!’.




LATEST EVENTS

13.05.2021 - Embassy Press Officer replies to a media question regarding the speech on the cyber security by the UK Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab

Question: Speaking at the National Cyber Security Centre’s CYBERUK conference on 12 May 2021, the UK Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab said that ‘states like Russia’ have a responsibility to prosecute criminals operating from their territory, ‘not shelter them’. How would you comment on this? Answer: The Embassy has on multiple occasions commented unfounded accusations of numerous ‘sins’ in cyberspace made against our country. It is disappointing that the British authorities keep using Russia as a negative example, while having no actual grounds for this. Over the past few years we have repeatedly suggested to the UK, as well as to the USA and other countries, to develop professional cooperation to tackle the issues arising in this field... The UK prefers resounding speeches and vague ‘sheltering criminals’ insinuations.


12.05.2021 - Embassy reply to a media request from The Guardian

The Embassy has no comment to make on the substance of the allegations against HRH Prince Michael of Kent made in the recent media publications. Prince Michael is well known in Russia as a champion of Russian-British friendship and cooperation. He has immensely contributed to developing human, cultural and economic ties between the two countries, including by serving as the Patron of the Russo-British Chamber of Commerce. In this capacity, His Royal Highness has maintained a wide range of contacts with Russian counterparts at various levels.


11.05.2021 - Воок of Condolence for the victims of the tragedy in School №175 in Kazan on 11.05.2021

The Embassy expresses sincere condolences to the families and friends of the victims of the tragic events in School №175 in Kazan on 11 May 2021, and wishes of a speedy recovery to everyone who was injured. A Book of Condolence is open at the Embassy's Consular Section. You can also send your message to: condolences@rusemb.org.uk.


05.05.2021 - Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova’s interview with the RT television channel, May 3, 2021

Question: What impact have the sanctions had on the state of relations between Russia and the West? Maria Zakharova: Unfortunately, the growing use of politically motivated, unilateral restrictive measures by a number of Western countries, primarily the United States, has become a reality of our time. We increasingly view the sanctions against Russia as a “gesture of despair” and a manifestation of the local elites’ inability to accept the new reality, abandon the stereotypes of their bloc-based thinking, and recognise Russia's right to independently determine its path of development and build relationships with its partners.


27.04.2021 - Statement by the Head of the Delegation of the Russian Federation to the Vienna Negotiations on Military Security and Arms Control KONSTANTIN GAVRILOV at the 1st Plenary meeting of the 85th Session of the Open Skies Consultative Commission (OSCC), Vienna, April 26, 2021

In terms of discussion of the issue of current implementation of the Treaty on Open (OST) Skies, the Russian Delegation would like to announce the official position of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia on the situation with regard to the Treaty on Open Skies.


21.04.2021 - Press release on summoning US Deputy Head of Mission to Foreign Ministry

On April 21, Deputy Chief of Mission of the US Embassy Bart Gorman was summoned to the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, where he was handed a note saying that 10 US Embassy employees in Moscow had been declared persona non grata. These people have been ordered to leave the Russian Federation before the end of the day on May 21.


16.04.2021 - Embassy comment on the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office statement concerning “Russia’s malign cyber activity”

We consider the FCDO statement of 15 April on “malign activity by Russian intelligence services in cyberspace” as nothing but an attempt to play along with the US, which as usually try to put a blame on Russia while obviously failing to ensure their own cyber security.


31.03.2021 - Embassy Press Officer replies to a media question regarding the inquest into the death of Dawn Sturgess

Question: Newly appointed to lead the inquest into the death of Dawn Sturgess, Baroness Hallet has announced her plans to examine the Russian state’s involvement in poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal in Salisbury as part of the inquest. Any comments? Answer: We see it as a confirmation of our earlier conclusion that the situation with regard to these tragic events would evolve according to the Litvinenko Case scenario. Regular investigation and regular use of existing international legal instruments (since there have been Russian nationals affected) is being substituted with a quasi-judicial procedure. It does not formally pertain to the incident in Salisbury as such, yet would undoubtedly be used to support again and again the groundless accusations against Russia made by the British authorities.


11.03.2021 - Embassy demarche on the UK anti-Russian activity in the information sphere

On 10 March 2021, the Embassy undertook a demarche to the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office regarding the leaked FCDO-related documents that reveal a large-scale campaign being performed by the UK Government aimed at exercising systematic influence on the Russian-language media space.


04.03.2021 - Embassy comment on the third anniversary of the Salisbury incident

Three years have now passed since the highly publicized incident in Salisbury. So far we have learnt little on what really happened. The British authorities laid the blame on Russia for an alleged use of chemical weapons on the British soil. Such a serious accusation however was not backed by any facts, proof or other sort of relevant information. Being ungrounded, it cannot be considered credible.



all messages